Allowed

Nashik Workers Union, v. M/S. Sicom Ltd. and Ors.

Bombay HC18 Jul 2005WP/10240/2004

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition citing the upholding of Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act by the Apex Court. The court allowed the withdrawal and granted liberty to challenge the Industrial Court orders via a separate petition.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed to be withdrawn; liberty granted to challenge Industrial Court orders by filing a separate petition.

Nashik Workers Union, Vs M/S. Sicom… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2005)

¶1

 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.:
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
 APPELLATE SIDE
 Writ Petition No.10240 of 2004
 ------------------------------------:-----------------------------------
 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders.
 coram, appearances, Court’s orders :
 or directions and Registrar’s :
 orders. :

¶2

 ------------------------------------:------------------------------------

¶3

 Mr.Bhavesh Parmar for petitioner.

¶4

 ----

¶5

CORAM : H.L GOKHALE &
 SMT.R.S.DALVI, JJ.
DATED : 18th July 2005
 P.C. :
 1. Mr.Parmar appearing for

¶6

 the petitioner seeks to withdraw
 this petition by stating that
 Section 29 of the State Financial
 Corporations Act has been upheld
 by the Apex Court. Petition is

¶7

 allowed to be withdrawn.

¶8

 2. Mr.Parmar seeks liberty to
 challenge the order passed by the
 Industrial Court in Complaint
 (ULP) Nos.804 of 1998 and 399 of
 1999 by filing a separate
 petition. He may file that
 petition and it will be considered,

¶9

 if permissible in law.

¶10

(H.L.GOKHALE, J.)

¶11

(SMT.R.S.DALVI, J.)

Nashik Workers Union, v. M/S. Sicom Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nashik Workers Union, v. M/S. Sicom Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sagar Pandurang Dhundre and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Lieutenant Commander Pratik Singha Vs the Union of India and Ors.

Pimpri Chinchwad Mahanagar Palika Madhyamik Adhyapak Sangh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Lt. Col A.K. Das Vs Union of India and Ors.

S.Kumars Ltd. Vs Dinesh Vasantrai Bhutta and Ors.

S.V. Kulkarni and Anr. Vs Union of India and Ors.