Subhash Chandra Tulsyan v. State of Mah.and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition was dismissed for want of prosecution without costs in a writ petition filed in the Bombay High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1007 OF 1993
Subhash Chandra Tulsyan ... Petitioners. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents.
None for the petitioners.
Ms.V.A.Sonpal, A.G.P. for the respondents.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 16h September, 2005.
P.C. :
. None for the petitioners.
. Petition is dismissed for want of
prosecution with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
Subhash Chandra Tulsyan
The State of Maharashtra
V.C. Daga
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court