Oral order in a second appeal. Court corrected an earlier minute to allow the respondent to withdraw a deposited sum of Rs. 18,000 to which the appellant had no objection.
Order to stand corrected to allow respondent to withdraw Rs. 18,000 deposited in the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
SECOND APPEAL NO.86 OF 2001.
Smt.Sushilabai w/o Shivajirao
Bhosale & ors. : Appellants.
versus
Ravindra Vasantrao Phadnis : Respondent.
Mr.D.A.Nalawade for the appellants.
Mr.G.H.Keluskar for the respondent.
CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J.
DATED : 22nd September 2005.
ORAL ORDER
1. This appeal is heard and decided by me on
18th August 2005 by Minutes of Order filed on 7th
April 2005 and accepted on 18th August 2005. The
advocate for the respondent wants to withdraw
Rs.18,000/- which was deposited in the trial
court. Advocate for the appellant has no
objection. Order to stand corrected accordingly.
2
[D.G.DESHPANDE,J]
Sushilabai w/o Shivajirao Bhosale
Ravindra Vasantrao Phadnis
D.G.Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court