The High Court of Bombay (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) dismissed the present appeal as the appellants were absent on the day of hearing and on the day it was listed fresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 386 OF 2005
-----------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
-------------------------------------------------------------
None for the Appellants.
Mr. R. G. Ketkar for
Respondent Nos. 1,3,4, 5A to
5-C, 6 to 8 .
CORAM : D.G. DESHPANDE,J.
DATED : 25TH AUGUST, 2005
P.C.
. This Appeal was on board on
18.8.2005 when nobody was present
for the appellants. Therefore,
it was kept today for dismissal.
Today also nobody is present for
the appellants. Mr. Ketkar for
the Respondents present. Appeal
is dismissed.
*****
Appellants
Respondent Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5A to 5-C, 6 to 8
D.G. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court