A criminal revision application was dismissed for default as the petitioner appeared without counsel and the copy was not served on the respondent.
Application dismissed for default due to non-appearance and non-service.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 81 OF 2005.
Shri Nitin Mahaveer Chougule.
...Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra.
...Respondent
None for applicant/petitioner
Shri V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP for respondent.
CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J
DATE : APRIL 5, 2005
P.C. :-
1.None appears for the applicant though two
advocates have entered their appearance for applicant.
Besides the learned APP for respondent states that the
copy of the application is not served on them.
Application dismissed for default.
Shri Nitin Mahaveer Chougule
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court