Criminal Revision Applications dismissed as withdrawn upon counsel stating the applicants received the subject amount and were not interested in pursuing them.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.75 OF 2003
Ms.Anju Ahuja ...Applicant
Versus
Mr.Mohan Thakurdas Chawla & Anr. ...Respondents
ALONG WITH
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.76 OF 2003
Smt.Pushpa Ahuja ...Applicant
Versus
Mr.Mohan Thakurdas Chawla & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr.Girish Kulkarni for Applicants.
Mr.Y.S.Bhate for Respondent No.1.
Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2.
CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
APRIL 6, 2005.
P.C.
1. Counsel for the Applicants states that the
: 2 :
Applicants have received the subject amount, for
which reason, the Applicants are not interested in
pursuing these Applications. Hence, dismissed as
withdrawn.
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
Ms.Anju Ahuja
Smt.Pushpa Ahuja
Mr.Mohan Thakurdas Chawla
A.M.KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court