Vidya Sharad Urankar v. the Special Land Acquision Officer (Mhada) and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.376 OF 2005
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2533 OF 1998
Vidya S. Urankar .... Petitioner Vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer, MHADA & Ors. .... Respondents
Shri P.J. Cutinho for the Petitioner. Shri G.W. Mattos, AGP, for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR &
V.M. KANADE, JJ.
DATED: AUGUST 22, 2005
P.C: On oral motion made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner/applicant, the notice of motion is
allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed of as
withdrawn.
(R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.)
(V.M. Kanade, J.)
Vidya S. Urankar
Special Land Acquisition Officer
MHADA
R.M.S. Khandeparkar
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court