Shri Harbansing Ghattarsingh and Another v. Shri Pradeep B. Shingore
Case brief
What is this about?
Two appeals were dismissed for default as the appellants failed to appear before the High Court of Bombay appellate side.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
FIRST APPEAL NO.594 OF 1987
Harbansing Chattarsingh & anr. .. Appellants
v/s.
Pradeep Balwant Shingore & anr. .. Respondents
Mr.G.S.Hegde for the respondent Nos.1 and 2.
ALONGWITH
FIRST APPEAL NO.595 OF 1987
Shri Harbansing Chattarsing Poonaki & anr. .. Appellants
v/s.
Smt.Anjali D. Shingore & ors. .. Respondents
Mr.G.S.Hegde for the respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND V.M.KANADE, JJ.
DATED : 18th August, 2005
P.C.
| None | present | for | the | appellan | ts. | Mr.Hegde, the |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| learned | advocate | is | present | for | the | respondents. | |
| The | Registry’s | report | discl | oses | that | the appellants |
|
| have | been | duly | served | about | the | hearing | of the |
matter. Since nobody has appeared on behalf of the
appellants, the appeals are dismissed for default.
(R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J.)
:2:
(V.M.KANADE, J.)
Harbansing Chattarsingh & anr.
Pradeep Balwant Shingore & anr.
Shri Harbansing Chattarsing Poonaki & anr.
Smt.Anjali D. Shingore & ors.
R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
V.M.KANADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court