The court restored a dismissed notice of motion for default upon the consent of the opposing counsel. No other substantive matter was heard or disposed of in this single-paragraph order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION 105 OF 2005
IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO,632 OF 2004
IN
MISC. PETITION 17 OF 2004
The Administrator General of
Maharashtra State ..Petitioner
versus
Dr.Amee Piyush Shah ..Respondent
and
Tubeweld Engineering Works Ltd. ..Applicants
Mr.A.L.N.Khatri for the Petitioner
Mr.B.R.Jhaveri for the Applicant in support.
Mr.K.P.Jain i/b. B.G.Saraf for the Respondent No.1
Mr.K.G.Munshi i/b.S. Satpute & Co. for the
Respondent No.2.
Coram : S.R.Sathe, J.
Dated : 2nd Dec., 2005
P.C.
1. The otherside advocate fairly submitted that
they have no objection to allow this Notice of
Motion for restoration of the petition which is
dismissed for default.
2. Hence, notice of motion 632 of 2004
dismissed on 21.7.2004 is restored.
3. Notice of Motion No.105 of 2005 is disposed
of.
(S.R.Sathe, J.)
The Administrator General of Maharashtra State
Dr. Amee Piyush Shah
Tubeweld Engineering Works Ltd.
S.R.Sathe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court