High Court chamber order condoning delay and allowing two chamber summons in a suit involving a caveator's application. No substantive legal principal decided.
Delay condoned; Chamber Summons No. 88 and 73 of 2005 allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.88 OF 2005
IN
SUIT NO.45 OF 2005
IN
PETITIONNO.23 OF 2004
Mr.Devendra Janardan Naghare ..Petitioner
Mrs.Sadhana D.Chachad ..Caveator
And
Revati Bhalchandra Mahajan
& Others ..Caveators
CHAMBER SUMMONS 73 OF 2005
IN
PETITION NO.23 OF 2004
Devendra J. Naghare ..Plaintiff
versus
Sadhana Chachad ..Defendant
Mr.D.R.Mishra for the Petitioner
Mr.S.C.More for the Caveator-Applicant.
Coram : S.R.Sathe, J.
Dated : 2nd Dec., 2005
P.C.
1. Heard both the learned Advocates. Delay is
condoned subject to to payment of cost of Rs.500/-
(Rupees Five Hundred Only). The other chamber
summons No.73 of 2005 seeking permission to file
list of documents is allowed and disposed of
accordingly.
(S.R.Sathe, J.)
Devendra Janardan Naghare
S.R.Sathe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court