Jayabharat Automobiles Ltd. v. Sanjay Khemka
Bombay HCNMS/965/2003
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court dismissed a notice of motion wherein the plaintiff refused to furnish security or an undertaking as required by Rule 148 of the Bombay High Court Rules for granting an injunction.
What the court decided
AI extract
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
¶2
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶3
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 965 OF 2003
¶4
IN
¶5
SUIT NO. 927 OF 2003
¶6
Jayabharat Automobiles Ltd. .. Plaintiffs
¶7
versus
¶8
Sanjay Khemka .. Defendant
¶9
Mr.Rishabh Shah with M. Dalvi i/b Banatwala & Co. for
the plaintiff.
¶10
Mr.S.C. Naidu i/b C.R. Naidu for the defendant.
¶11
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK,J.
¶12
DATED : 17th March 2005.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Jayabharat Automobiles Ltd.
- respondent
Sanjay Khemka
Coram
AI extract
D.G. KARNIK
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court