B.S.Vora v. Bhagwandas Tanna.
Case brief
What is this about?
A notice of motion in a suit where parties were absent was disposed of because the underlying suit appeared to be already disposed of.
What did the court decide?
Motion disposed of as underlying suit appeared disposed of.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3140 OF 1990
IN
SUIT NO.3214 OF 1990
Shri Bhadresh S.Vora .. Plaintiff
versus
Bhagwandas Tanna & ors .. Defendants
...
None for parties
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J
DATED : 24th March 2005.
P.C:-
1. None present for either of the parties. Suit
appears to have been disposed of. Hence, motion does
not survive and is disposed of.
Coram
D.G. Karnik
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court