Sureshchandra Vora. v. Bhagwandas Tanna and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Notice of Motion disposed of as the underlying Suit appears to have been disposed of, leaving the motion without survival.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3139 OF 1990
IN
SUIT NO.3213 OF 1990
Sureshchandra Vora .. Plaintiff
versus
Bhagwandas Tanna & ors .. Defendants
...
None for parties
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J
DATED : 24th March 2005.
P.C:-
1. None present for either of the parties. Suit
appears to have been disposed of. Hence, motion does
not survive and is disposed of.
D.G.KARNIK, J
Sureshchandra Vora
Bhagwandas Tanna & ors
D.G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court