The High Court of Bombay disposed of a notice of motion in a Civil Suit as infructuous, accepting the uncontroverted statement that nothing further survives due to ad interim orders.
Motion disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1186 OF 2003
IN
SUIT NO.2707 OF 2001
Doraiswamy Gurumurthy .. Plaintiff
versus
Mr.V.R.Babu & ors .. Defendants
Mr.Mr Manoj Bajpai i/b R.J.Singh for Plff
Mr.N.Y.Gupte i/b Mohan Tekavade for Deft nos. 20 to
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J
DATED : 18th March 2005.
P.C:-
1. Heard learned counsel for the defendant nos. 20
to 67. None present for other parties.
2. Learned counsel for the appearing defendants
states that in view of the ad interim orders passed by
this court nothing further survives in the motion.
The uncontroverted statement is accepted. Motion is
disposed of as infructuous.
2
D.G.KARNIK, J
Doraiswamy Gurumurthy
Mr. V.R. Babu
D.G. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court