Single-paragraph order condoning a two-day delay in filing an appeal. Court exceeds time limits based on affidavits and processes the appeal for admission.
Delay in filing appeal is condoned and appeal is processed for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3537 OF 2005 IN APPEAL (LODGING) NO.1219 OF 2005 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1915 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO.1796 OF 2005
M/s.Chheda Housing Development Corporation Appellant
vs.
Smt.Bibijan Shaikh Farid & ors. Respondents
Mr.H.S.S.Murthy i/b.M/s.P.M. & Mithi & Co. for the applicant.
Ms.Trisha Pangorkar i/b.Mr.Y.M.Abrahim for the respondents 1 to 9.
Mr.Jaydeep Raut i/b.M/s.Ranjit & Co. for the respondent no.11.
Mr.S.D.Kondvilkar for the respondents 12 and 13.
Mr.R.P.Gurjar i/b.M/s.V.Mistry & Co. for the respondent no.10.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA & D.G. KARNIK, JJ . DATED : 25th November 2005
P.C.
Heard.
was prevented by sufficient cause in filing the appeal
2
in time. 4. Delay in filing the appeal is condoned. 5. Office to process the appeal and post it for admission. 6. Notice of motion stands disposed of. (R.M.LODHA, J.) (D. G. KARNIK, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether 2-day delay in filing appeal warrants condonation under sufficient cause?
M/s. Chheda Housing Development Corporation
Smt. Bibijan Shaikh Farid & ors.
R.M. LODHA
D.G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
