The Division Bench dismissed an appeal in limine against an order awarding backwages, concurring with the reasoning of the Single Judge in a writ petition.
Appeal dismissed in limine.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J.
APPEAL NO.679 OF 2004 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1370 OF 2004
Shital S. Pathak
.. Appellant
v/s.
The Sind Brahma Sikhya Sammelan & anr. .. Respondents
Mr.Mihir Desai for the appellant.
CORAM : R.M.LODHA AND D.G.KARNIK, JJ.
DATED : 24th November, 2005
P.C.
Heard Mr.Mihir Desai, the learned counsel
for the appellant.
| 2. | For | the | reasons | recorded | by | the | learned | Single |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judge | in | para | 5 of |
the imp |
ugned | order | with | which |
| we | conc | ur, | we find |
that | the | appella | nt has |
rightly |
| been | held | entitled | to b |
ackwages | at | the | rate of |
25% |
only upto the year 2002-2003 and full backwages
thereafter.
(R.M.LODHA, J.)
(D.G. KARNIK, J.)
Shital S. Pathak
The Sind Brahma Sikhya Sammelan
R.M.LODHA
D.G.KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
