Disposed
Smt Laxmi Muragavel Harijan Vs
Bombay HCGP/103/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
¶1
1
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶3
GUARDIAN PETITION NO.103 OF 2005
¶4
Smt. Laxmi Muragavel Harijan. ..Petitioner.
¶5
Ms.Ratna Jaiswal i/b Law Loyals for Petitioner.
¶6
CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J
¶7
DATE : AUGUST 3, 2005.
P.C. :
¶8
1. Heard counsel for the petitioner.
¶9
2. As the petition is by the mother of the
minors and no objection has been received for
appointment of petitioner as guardian of the minors,
coupled with the fact that the amount involved is
nominal, petition is made absolute in terms of prayer
clause (a) and (c).
¶10
3. Ordered accordingly.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Smt. Laxmi Muragavel Harijan
Coram
AI extract
A.M.KHANWILKAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court