The Chamber declared no separate order required in the execution application in view of the reasons recorded in the companion chamber summons and relief already granted.
No order of the court was recorded; the stay relied upon reasons in a companion chamber summons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.507 OF 2005
IN
EXECUTION APPLICATION (L) NO.124 OF 2005
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2560 OF 1984
Dattatraya Mahadeo Aney. ..Judg.Creditor.
V/s.
Dilwara Co-op.Hsg.Soc.Ltd. ..Judg.Debtor.
And
State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents.
Mr.L.C.Joshi for Judgment creditor.
Mr.Prashant Beri i/b Beri & Co. for Judg.debtor.
Mr.Chetan Kapadia i/b Manilal Kher for respondent
No.3. for Defendant.
CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J
DATE : AUGUST 3, 2005.
P.C. :
1. In view of the reasons recorded in the
companion chamber summons No.20 of 2005 and relief
already granted in the said chamber summons, no
separate order is required in this chamber summons.
Dattatraya Mahadeo Aney
Dilwara Co-op.Hsg.Soc.Ltd.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
A.M.KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court