In a criminal case, the High Court of Bombay at Goa stayed the execution of a sentence imposed by the Sessions Judge, Margao, after the applicant executed a bond of Rs.20,000 with one surety.
Stay on the execution of the sentence imposed on the accused by the Sessions Judge, Margao, upon executing a bond of Rs.20,000 with one surety.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APLICATION NO. 232 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 30 OF 2005
Shri Katu Dholo Gaonkar, Canacona, Goa. ... Applicant
versus
State(through P.P.) ... Respondent
Mr. Arun Bras de Sa, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. S. N. Sardessai, Public Prosecutor for the State.
CORAM : N. A. BRITTO, J.
DATE : 17TH NOVEMBER, 2005.
P.C.:
Heard Mr. Arun Bras de Sa, the learned Counsel
appearing on behalf of the applicant/accused. The execution of the sentence imposed upon the accused by Order dated 312005 of the learned IIIrd Assistant Sessions Judge, Margao and as confirmed by Judgment dated 10112005 of the learned Sessions Judge, Margao is hereby stayed upon the applicant executing a bond of Rs.20,000/ with one surety in the like
2
amount to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge,
Margao.
Authenticated copy of the order be given to the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant.
N. A. BRITTO, J.
RD.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the execution of the sentence imposed by the lower court should be stayed pending a bond.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Katu Dholo Gaonkar
State
N. A. BRITTO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
