Disposed
Shri Gajanan Majik, Bicholim, Goa. v. State through Public Prosecutor, Panaji-Goa.
Bombay HCCRMA/227/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO.227 OF 2005
Shri Gajanan Majik, Bicholim, Goa. ... Applicant
versus
State through Public Prosecutor, PanajiGoa. ... Respondent
Mr. Rohit Bras de Sa, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. S. N. Sardessai, Public Prosecutor for the State/Respondent.
CORAM : N. A. BRITTO, J.
DATE : 15TH NOVEMBER,2005
P.C.:
Heard Mr. Rohit Bras de Sa, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant/accused and Mr. S. N. Sardessai, the learned Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the complainant/State.
The execution of the Judgment of the learned J.M.F.C., Bicholim dated 1672002 as confirmed by Judgment dated 15102005 of the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Panaji is hereby stayed upon the applicant/accused executing a bond of
2
Rs.5000/ with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.F.C., Bicholim.
N. A. BRITTO, J.
RD.
Shri Gajanan Majik
State through Public Prosecutor, PanajiGoa
N. A. Britto
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court