The High Court, by consent, directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for refund, decide within 12 weeks after hearing, and undertake cooperation.
Respondents shall consider the petitioner's claim for refund within 12 weeks after giving an adequate opportunity of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE.
WRIT PETITION NO. 2308
OF 2005.
Ms S.R. Nagpal & Sons (India). ..Petitioner. vs. Union of India & ors. ..Respondents. ------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes,Office : Memoranda of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders appearnaces,Courts’s : orders or directions : and Registrar’s orders. :
Shri Madhur Baya for the petitioner. Shri B.A. Desai, Addl.Solicitor General with P.S. Jetly i/b Dr.T.C. Kaushik for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM: V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 20.9.2005. P.C.: . Rule returnable forthwith. Respondents waive service. . By consent of parties following order is passed. . The respondents shall consider the petitioner’s claim for refund, vide letter dated 4.11.2004 (Ex.‘D’ to the petition), in accordance with the law, and decide the same within 12 weeks hereof, after giving the petitioners an adequate oppourtunity of hearing.
All issues are kept open.
Petitioner undertakes to cooperate in
investigation.
. Rule made absolute in terms of
this order with no order as to costs.
. Shri Jetly undertakes to
communicate this order to the concerned
authority for its implementation.
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.) ( V.C.DAGA,J.)
Ms S.R. Nagpal & Sons (India)
Union of India
V.C. Daga
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
