The single judge rejected an application seeking stay of a decree of restitution of conjugal rights granted to the wife, as the appellant provided no reasons to challenge the trial court's judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 70 OF 2005
IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.65 OF 2005
Henry peter Pesso ..Appellant
Versus
Rose Olive Pesso .Respondent
Mr.Vinay M. Bhate for the appellant
CORAM: S.B.MHASE &
S.R.SATHE, JJ.
DATE : 18th July, 2005
P.C.
1. Heard.
2. This is a Civil Application seeking stay of the
decree of restitution of conjugal rights granted in
favour of the Respondent-wife. No reasons are shown by
the Husband to avoid the competence of the decree or an
error in the judgment of the Trial Court. Hence
application is rejected.
(S.R.SATHE, J.) (S.B.MHASE,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant a stay of the decree of restitution of conjugal rights granted in favor of the wife.
Henry Peter Pesso
Rose Olive Pesso
S.B. Mhase
S.R. Sathe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court