This court condensed the delay in two civil applications and allowed them, noting no opposition was forthcoming from respondents.
Condoned delay and allowed both civil applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2792 OF 2005
IN
FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 11995 OF 2005
AND
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2796 OF 2005
IN
FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 12011 OF 2005
-----------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
-------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. J. J. Xavier for the
Appellants.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM : D.G. DESHPANDE,J.
DATED : 23RD AUGUST, 2005
P.C.
. Heard counsel for the
appellants.
. Advocate for the respondent
was present on earlier occasion.
He took time to file reply. No
reply is filed. Nobody is there
to oppose the applications.
Delay is satisfactorily
explained. Hence delay condoned.
Both the Civil Applications are
allowed.
. Put up appeals for admission
after two weeks.
*****
D.G. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court