The High Court allowed a civil application for substituted service by pasting in Bombay.
Application for substituted service by pasting in respect of Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 is allowed and the application is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3593 OF 2005
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.1024 OF 2002
Shri Rajendra G. Pujari
(Since deceased)
Mrs.Suhasini Rajendra Pujari
& ors. : Appellants.
versus
Smt.Fulwasadevi w/o.Hawaldar
Patel & ors. : Respondents.
Mr.R.D.Mishra for the appellants.
Ms.R.S.Dwidwedi for the respondents.
CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J.
DATED : 22nd August 2005.
ORAL ORDER
1. This application is for substituted
service in respect of Respondent Nos. 3 to 5.
Substituted service by pasting is allowed.
Application is disposed of.
2
[D.G.DESHPANDE,J]
Shri Rajendra G. Pujari (Since deceased) & ors.
Mrs. Suhasini Rajendra Pujari
Smt. Fulwasadevi w/o. Hawaldar
D.G. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court