This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(-1-)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5669 OF 2005
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 570 OF 1997
Ghallappa Sardar Nadgeri ...Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
.....
Mr. P.P. haldikar i/b R.V. More, Advocate for
Applicant
Mr. Y.S. Shinde, A.P.P. for State.
CORAM:SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.
DATED: 9TH SEPTEMBER, 2005
P. C.:-
1. Heard both sides.
2. The applicant has preferred Criminal appeal No.
570 of 1997 against his conviction under various
sections of Prevention of Corruption Act. The
applicant was in service, however, on account of his
conviction he has been removed from service. It is
stated that the applicant is reaching the age of
superannuation, hence, it is prayed that this appeal
be heard expeditiously. In view of the facts and
circumstances, the said prayer is reasonable. Hence,
the appeal to be placed on the final hearing board in
the week commencing from 17.10.2005 before the
appropriate court.
3. Application is disposed of.
(-2-)
*****
Ghallappa Sardar Nadgeri
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court