The State of Maharashtra v. Ravindra Mahadeo Dhadake
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court rejected the State's applications for cancellation of bail granted to four respondents. The bench held that with investigation complete, trial ongoing, and no specific allegations of absconding, witness tampering, or false complaints, bail was not a fit case for cancellation.
What did the court decide?
Bail granted to the respondents was to remain in force; applications for cancellation were rejected.
What the court decided
(-1-)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5195 OF 2003
The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant
Versus
Ravindra Mahadeo Dhadake ...Respondent
ALONGWITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5196 OF 2003
The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant
Versus
Suhas Hanmant Sorate ...Respondent
ALONGWITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5197 OF 2003
The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail granted to the respondents can be cancelled at the stage when investigation is over, charges framed, and trial has started.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
The State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Ravindra Mahadeo Dhadake
- respondent
Suhas Hanmant Sorate
- respondent
Niwas Hanmant Sorate
- respondent
Sagar Sambhaji Padalkar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court