Coram Palshikar and Chavan, J. allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing a restoration petition for Criminal Appeal No. 781 of 2000 by consent of parties and restored the appeal for hearing.
Condonation of delay in filing restoration petition granted; Criminal Appeal No. 781 of 2000 restored to file and listed for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
GPN-J-332-ARHCB-8_94-13,10,500-ALA4. SPL.H.C.A.S.C.D. 79e.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4436 OF 2005
IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4437 OF 2005
IN
CRI. APPEAL NO. 781 OF 2000
Ashok Atmaram Patil ...Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. ------------------------------------------------ ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------Mr. M.S.Karnik for the applicant. Mr. R.S.Khadapkar APP for the State.
CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & R.C. CHAVAN, JJ.
DTAED; 19TH JULY, 2005 .
P.C.
| 1. | Application | for co |
ndonation |
|---|---|---|---|
| of | delay in |
filing |
the |
| restoration | petition | granted, | for |
| reasons | mentioned | therein. | Delay |
| condoned. | By | consent of |
parties |
| application | for | restoration | of |
| original | criminal a |
ppeal No. |
781 |
| of 200 |
0 taken |
up for |
reasons |
| mentioned | therein | and is |
allowed. |
| Criminal | appeal | Nio.781 of |
2000 |
restored to file. List it for
hearing in due course.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay in filing restoration petition is condonable.
Ashok Atmaram Patil
State of Maharashtra
V.G. Palshikar
R.C. Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
