Disposed
Sitabai Vithal Kharat and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPPLN/4573/2004
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4573 OF 2004
(For condonation of delay)
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1280 OF 2004
Sau Sitabai Vithal Kharat and anr.
...Applicants
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ----------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearnaces, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders
...Respondent.
Court’s or Judge’s Orders.
Mr. R.S. Khadapkar, APP for the respondent - State.
CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR &
R.C. CHAVAN, JJ.
DATE : 18h July, 2005
P.C.:
| . | Ta | king into consid |
eration | the |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| reasons | mentioned in |
the | ||
| application | for condonatio |
n | of | |
| delay, | we | feel that |
it | is |
| necessary | to | condone the |
delay | in |
| view | of | the peculiar |
av | erments |
| made | in | the application. |
Delay, |
:2:
as prayed for is, therefore,
condoned.
(V.G.PALSHIKAR, J.)
(R.C. CHAVAN, J.)
Sau Sitabai Vithal Kharat
The State of Maharashtra
V.G. Palshikar
R.C. Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court