This was a brief appeal dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. The sole reason recorded for dismissal was not specified in the judgment text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO. 677 OF 2005. IN COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 610 OF 2004. IN COMPANY APPLICATION (L) NO. 1066 OF 2004. IN COMPANY APPLICATION (L) NO. 1103 OF 2004. IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 347 OF 2004.
Administrator of the Specified Undertaking of the Unit Trust of India.
. ..Appellants
vs.
Mahakali Flyover Company Ltd. ...Respondents. Shri F. Devetre, Senior Counsel with Shri D.R. Mehta i/b M/s Dhruv Liladhar & Co. for the appellants. Shri V.R. Dond i/b Cr.Bailey & Co. for respondent No.1. Shri J.B. Chinoy with P. Sakseria, Devyasha Chaurasia & Shri Sachin Chandarna i/b Manilal Kher & Ambalal & Co. for respondent No.2. Shri Parimal K. Shroff with Shri Subodh Joshi, Ms. Radhika Pinzara and Ms. Hetal Sarla i/b M/s Parimal Shroff & Co. for the Intervenors.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 19.9.2005.
P.C. : ---- 1. This appeal is filed by the Administrator of the Specified Undertaking of the Unit Trust of India. One of us (V.C.Daga,J.) is a holder of units of the Unit Trust of India. This fact is disclosed in the open Court so as to bring it to the notice of the parties appearing in the appeal. Each of them
(2)
expressly states that they have no objection if this Court hears the appeal. The parties to the appeal
have also agreed to file pursis in support of their
no objection during the course of the day.
with annexures.
dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Administrator of the Specified Undertaking of the Unit Trust of India
Mahakali Flyover Company Ltd.
V.C. Daga
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
