The court noted that the underlying matter was settled amicably between parties. Consent terms were accepted and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO.468 OF 1999
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2598 OF 1994
Ramesh Kumbla ..Appellants.
(Orig.Resp.No.1)
Vs.
Union Carbide (India) Ltd.
& Ors. ..Respondent.
(Orig.Petnr. &
Resp.Nos.2 to 5
Orig.Resp.Nos.2
to 5)
Mr.Bhavesh Parmar, Advocate for the Appellants.
Mr.Santosh Shetty, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM: A.P.SHAH AND
S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ.
DATED: 16TH MARCH, 2005
P.C :
Mentioned. Not on Board.
Learned counsel appearing for the parties
informed that the matter has been settled amicably.
Consent terms tendered taken on record and
marked ‘X’ for identification.
Order in terms of the consent terms.
Certified copy expedited.
Ramesh Kumbla
Union Carbide (India) Ltd. & Ors.
A.P. Shah
S.J. Vazifdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court