An appeal regarding a summary suit was disposed of by the court in terms of consent terms between the parties. The impugned appeal order was set aside.
Impugned order set aside; appeal disposed of in terms of consent terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO.167 OF 2005
IN
SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.580 OF 2002
IN
SUMMARY SUIT NO.675 OF 2002
M/s.Surajmani Enterprises
& Ors. ..Appellant.
(Orig.Deft.Nos.1 to 6)
Vs.
Sudha Dwarkadas Udeshi
& Ors. ..Respondents.
(Orig.Plff. & Orig.
Deft. Nos.7 to 9)
Mr.Nivit Srivastav, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr.Rajesh Shah, Advocate for the Respondents.
CORAM: A.P.SHAH AND
S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ.
DATED: 16TH MARCH, 2005
P.C :
Heard Advocates.
2. Consent terms between Appellants and Respondent
No.1 tendered, taken on record and marked ‘X’ for
identification.
3. Appeal is disposed of in terms of the consent
terms.
:2:
Certified copy expedited.
M/s.Surajmani Enterprises & Ors.
Sudha Dwarkadas Udeshi & Ors.
A.P.SHAH
S.J.VAZIFDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court