The appellants sought withdrawal of the appeal as infructuous. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and ordered refund of court fees without costs.
Withdrawal of the appeal as infructuous allowed and refund of court fees granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J.
APPEAL NO.463 OF 1981 IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.935 OF 1981 IN SUIT NO.1080 OF 1973
Messrs Sharan Brothers Agencies & anr. .. Appellants
v/s.
Messrs Ramchand Silk Mills & anr. .. Respondents
None present. CORAM : R.M. LODHA AND J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 9th August, 2005 P.C. The praecipe has been taken out by the advocate for the appellants seeking withdrawal of the appeal having become infructuous. 2. As prayed by way of praecipe, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn as infructuous. Refund of court fee as per law.
No costs.
(R.M.LODHA, J.)
Messrs Sharan Brothers Agencies & anr.
Messrs Ramchand Silk Mills & anr.
R.M. LODHA
J.P. DEVADHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
