M/S. Skylark Co-Op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. v. Mr. Subhash Aware
Bombay HCAPP/335/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶2
Appeal (Ld) No.335 of 2005
in
Notice of Motion No. 325 of 2003
in
Suit No.41 of 2003
¶3
Lal Bherumal Laungani ..Appellant
¶4
vs.
¶5
1. Shri Max Cajetan Travasso
and others ..Respondents
¶6
Mr.S.H.Doctor i/b Mr.Anil Sampat for appellant.
Mr.V.A.Thorat with Mr.A.Bookwala i/b Mr.Pankaj
Thatte for respondents.
Mr.D.D.Madon for intervenor.
¶7
CORAM: A.P.SHAH &
S.J.VAZIFDAR JJ.
26th April, 2005
¶8
P.C.
¶9
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
¶10
2. Mr.Doctor tenders on record the affidavit of
¶11
the appellant. Request made by the appellant for
extension of time seems to be reasonable. Time to
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Lal Bherumal Laungani
- respondent
Shri Max Cajetan Travasso
Coram
AI extract
A.P. Shah
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court