Allowed
Mrs. Naseem Yusuf Shaikh Mandilkar v. Yusuf Abdul Kadar Mandilkar and Anr.
Bombay HCNMA/645/2004
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Notice of Motion No.645 of 2004
in
Appeal No.l05l of 2003
in
Execution Appln No. 383 of l998
in
M.J.Petition No.873 of l996
Mrs Naseem Yusuf Shaikh Mandilkar... Appellant
vs
Mrs Yusuf Kadar Mandilkar and anr...Respondents
Mr.T J Pandian for appellant
None for respondent
CORAM: A.P.SHAH & S.J.VAZIFDAR JJ.
Dated 9.3.2005
P.C:
. Heard advocate for appellant.
. Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of
prayer clause (a).
Mrs Naseem Yusuf Shaikh Mandilkar
Mrs Yusuf Kadar Mandilkar and anr
A.P.SHAH
S.J.VAZIFDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court