This single-paragraph order dismissed Suit No. 76 of 1985 due to the absence of the plaintiff and defendants when called, applying Order 9 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Suit dismissed under Order 9 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 76 of 1985
Ravindra M. Karani .. Plaintiff
versus
Prakashchandra J. Jain & ors. .. Defendants
...
None present for the plaintiff.
None present for the defendants.
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK,J.
DATED : 4th August 2005.
P.C.:
1. None present for either side when called.
Suit is dismissed under Order 9 Rule 3 of the Code of
Civil Procedure.
D.G. KARNIK, J
1 provisions across 1 enactments
D.G. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court