Disposed
B.R.Mehta. v. Joseph Mathi.
Bombay HCS/1380/1979
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIDNARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISIDICTION
¶2
SUIT NO.1380 OF 1979
¶3
B.R.Mehta .. Plaintiff
¶4
Vs.
¶5
Joseph Mathi ... Defendant
¶6
Mr.Vipul Shukla for the plaintiff
¶7
Defendant present in person
¶8
CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J.
¶9
DATE : 9TH AUGUST, 2005
¶10
P.C. :
¶11
. No records and proceedings are available in
¶12
the record department. Both the plaintiff and the
defendant and the learned counsel for the plaintiff
have tendered consent minutes of order dt.9.8.05. The
same are taken on record and marked ’X’ for
identification. Suit is decreed in terms of the said
consent minutes of decree on admission. Refund of
court fee as per rules. Defendant who is appearing in
person states that he does not wish to engage an
advocate as he is settling the suit.
Coram
AI extract
S.U. KAMDAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court