Disposed
Rambhao Mahadev Raut and Ors. v. Bansi Shankar Ghadge and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/5428/2003
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.5428 OF 2003
Rambhao Mahadeo Raut & Ors.
..Petitioners.
v/s.
Bansi Shankar Ghadage & Ors. ..Respondents.
Shri S.S.Patwardhan, advocate for petitioners.
CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J.
DATE : 10TH SEPTEMBER, 2004.
P.C. :-
1.This petition is directed against the order dated
3/5/2003 rendered by the Joint Charity Commissioner
below Exh.23 in Appeal No. 36 of 2002 by which the
application of the respondents was allowed. In Exh.
23-application the respondents prayed for sending the
disputed and admitted signatures of the petitioners for
opinion of the handwriting expert. The application was
allowed and the following directions were given :
2.The disputed and admitted
signatures and also handwriting
2
under change report No. 536/02
be sent for expert opinion on
payment of token amount of
Rs.1,000/- asking them to
undertake full payment of
handwriting expert.
3.The document be sent to
handwriting experts Pune or
Aurangabad for examination and
opinion.
4. After expert opinion the case be fixed for final hearing."
2.Mr.Patwardhan, Learned counsel for the
petitioners on instructions states that he is not
pressing this petition and petitioners will be
satisfied if the directions are given to the
respondents to place on record disputed signatures
forthwith for sending them to the handwriting expert
alongwith the admitted signatures of the petitioners
within a time fram.
3. I have perused the impugned order and the other
3
material placed before me. In my opinion the following
order will meet the ends of justice.
a)The respondents are directed to place on
record the disputed signatures of the petitioner
within 5 weeks from the date of production of
this order before the Joint Charity Commissioner.
b)Petitioners undertakes to communicate a
copy of this order to the respondents by
Registered AD and under postal certificate within
15 days from today.
c)On production of the disputed signatures
of the petitioners on record, the same may be
forwarded alongwith an admitted signatures to the
handwriting experts within two weeks therefrom.
d)If the respondents fail to produce on
record the disputed signatures within the time
framed, the Joint Charity Commissioner shall
ignore the impugned order dated 3/5/2003 and
proceed with the hearing of the appeal. Petition
is disposed of.
4
JUDGE.
5
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1927 OF 2004
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.5428 OF 2003
Rambhao Mahadeo Raut & Ors...Petitioners.
v/s.
Bansi Shankar Ghadage & Ors. ..Respondents.
Shri S.S.Patwardhan, advocate for petitioners.
CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J.
DATE : 10TH SEPTEMBER, 2004.
P.C. :-
1.In view of the order passed in the Writ Petition
the Civil Application is disposed of.
Rambhao Mahadeo Raut & Ors.
Bansi Shankar Ghadage & Ors.
D.B.Bhosal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court