Two criminal writ petitions were disposed of as the parties had amicably settled all disputes inter se. The consent terms were accepted, and undertakings given by the parties were accorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1806 OF 2004
Mr. Narendra B. Verma & Ors. ..Petitioners.
V/s.
M/s. Jankidevi Educational ..Respondents.
Trust & Ors.
---
WITH
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1807 OF 2004
Omprakash Agarwal ..Petitioner
v/s.
M/s. Jankidevi Educational Trust ..Respondents.
and Ors.
---
Shri C.G. Gavnekar for the Petitioners.
Shri Girish Kedia for Respondent.
Shri A.S.Gadkari, APP for Respondent-State.
-----
CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
DATED : 02.11.2004
PC :-
. Counsel for the parties state that the
contesting parties have amicably settled all the
disputes inter se. The consent terms are reduced into
writing.
. The consent terms signed by the respective
parties as well as their counsels tendered and taken
2
on record. Both the petitions are disposed of in
terms of the consent terms. Undertaking given by the
parties as reflected in the consent terms are
accepted.
. Ordered accordingly.
Mr. Narendra B. Verma & Ors.
Omprakash Agarwal
M/s. Jankidevi Educational Trust & Ors.
A.M.KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court