The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in an ordinary original civil jurisdiction notice of motion, found no merit in and dismissed the petitioner's application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 269 OF 2004 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1840 OF 2003
Parle Tilak Vidyalaya Association
..Petitioner
Versus
University of Mumbai and Anr.
...Respondents
Mr. N.M. Ganguli for the petitioner in support. Mr. Susheel Mahadeshwar for respondent No.1. Mr. M.D. Naik, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.2.
CORAM : DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.
DATE: AUGUST 13, 2004 .
P.C.
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. We
find no merit in this Notice of Motion. The Notice of Motion is
dismissed.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Parle Tilak Vidyalaya Association
University of Mumbai
Dalveer Bhandari
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
