The court allowed a notice of motion craved for restoration of a suit dismissed for want of prosecution, noting that the defendants have been duly served and no representative appeared.
Notice of Motion allowed; Suit restored to file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3419 OF 2002
IN
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 719 OF 2002
M/s. Bharat Hosiery Mills ..Plaintiffs
versus
M/s. Anupam Textiles ..Defendants
Mr. T. M. Nadar for the Plaintiffs.
None for the Defendants.
CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J.
DATE : 1ST NOVEMBER, 2004.
P.C. :
. Heard learned counsel for the Plaintiffs.
This Notice of Motion is taken out for restoration
of the suit which was dismissed in default on
27.11.2002. Defendants have been served as per the
affidavit of service dated 26.10.2004. They have
been served by RPAD. Acknowledgement singed by the
defendants is there. Nobody is present for the
defendants. Therefore notice of motion is allowed.
Suit is restored to file. Notice of Motion disposed
of accordingly.
****
D. G. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court