Domnic Francis Pereira v. Joseph Paul Pereia and Ors.
Bombay HCNMS/2897/2002
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This order does not decide any principle of law applicable to such cases.
What the court decided
AI extract
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
- 1 -
¶2
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDI |
CATURE AT |
BOMBAY | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ORDINARY ORIGINAL |
CIVIL | JURIS | DICTION |
| NOTICE OF MOTION |
NO.2997 | OF | 2002 |
| IN | |||
| SUIT NO.1240 |
OF | 1989 | |
| Domnic Francis Pereira | ... Plaintiff | ||
| v/s | |||
| Joseph Paul Pereira and ors. | ... Defendants | ||
| Mr Bhandary i/b M/s Bhandary and Bhandary for Plaintiff. Mr A. Thakkar i/b M/s Thakkar and Co. for Defendant |
|||
| No.4 in support. | |||
| Ms Shaikh i/b M/s S.K. Srivastava and Co. for | |||
| Defendant No.3. | |||
| Ms Chandurkar i/b M/s Purnanand and Co. for Defenmdant No.7. |
|||
| CORAM : D.K.DESHMUKH J. DATE : 13TH AUGUST 2004 |
¶3
- 2 -
¶4
P.C.: -
¶5
- By consent of parties, notice of motion is
Coram
AI extract
D.K. Deshmukh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court