A single order granting an adjournment in multiple First Appeal cases before the Appellate Tribunal for FEMA, PMLA. The tribunal listed further argument for the respondent at a later date with the consent of parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS, PBPT Act AT NEW DELHI
| (1) FPA-FE-58/MUM/2009 M/s. South Indian Bank |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
| (2) FPA-FE-59/MUM/2009 | ||
| M/s. State Bank of Hyderabad | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (3) FPA-FE-62/MUM/2009 | ||
| M/s. Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
| (4) FPA-FE-65/MUM/2009 | ||
| M/s. Dena Bank | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| & | ||
| (5) FPA-FE-66/MUM/2009 | ||
| M/s. UCO Bank | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement Mumbai | Respondent | |
| , | … | |
| Advocates/Authorized Representatives wh | o appe | ared |
| For the Appellant (South Indian Bank) : | Shri Shri |
Madhav Khurana, Advocate Aditya Mukherjee, Advocate |
| Ms. Ms. |
Satya Jha, Advocate Riya Arora, Advocate |
FPA-FE-58-59/MUM/2009, FPA-FE-62/MUM/2009 & FPA-FE-65-66/MUM/2009
Page 1 of 2
| For the Appellant (M/s. State Bank of Hyderabad) |
: | Shri Ashok Kr. Panda, Sr. Advocate Shri A.V. Rangam, Advocate Shri Buddy A. Ranganadhan, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the Appellant (M/s. Dena Bank) |
: | Shri Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Advocate Shri Arpan Wadhawan, Advocate |
| For the Appellant (M/s. UCO Bank) |
: | Shri Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Advocate Shri Sarfaraz Khan, Advocate |
| For the Respondent | : | Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate |
CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 18.01.2021
The matter is taken up through video conferencing. The appearances of the learned counsels are as above.
FPA-FE-58-59/MUM/2009, FPA-FE-62/MUM/2009 & FPA-FE-6566/MUM/2009
Further argument on behalf of the appellant i.e. South Indian Bank continued and concluded. The learned counsel for the Respondent (ED) argued the matter for some time and sought an adjournment. The request for adjournment is considered and allowed.
With the consent of both the parties, list the appeal tomorrow i.e. on 19.01.2021 for further argument on behalf of Respondent.
(G. C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 18th January, 2021
‘D’
FPA-FE-58-59/MUM/2009, FPA-FE-62/MUM/2009 & FPA-FE-65-66/MUM/2009
Page 2 of 2
M/s. South Indian Bank
The Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
M/s. State Bank of Hyderabad
M/s. Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur
M/s. Dena Bank
M/s. UCO Bank
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
