This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. FPA-FE-59/MUM/2009 M/s. State Bank of Hyderabad … Appellant Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent 2. FPA-FE-62/MUM/2009 M/s. Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur … Appellant Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent 3. FPA-FE-65/MUM/2009 M/s. Dena Bank … Appellant Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent & 4. FPA-FE-66/MUM/2009 M/s. UCO Bank … Appellant Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellants : None For the respondent : None CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 30.09.2020
FPA-FE-59, 62, 65-66/ MUM/2009
The matters are listed on 14th October, 2020, but due to pandemic COVID-19 situation and in view of notification dated 30.09.2020 read with earlier notifications dated 16.03.2020, 23.03.2020, 26.03.2020, 15.04.2020, 04.05.2020, 18.05.2020, 30.06.2020, 16.07.2020, 31.07.2020, 17.08.2020, 02.09.2020 & 08.09.2020 issued by Appellate Tribunal regarding suspension
FPA-FE-59, 62, 65-66/ MUM/2009
Page 1 of 2
of functioning of Appellate Tribunal, the matters are adjourned to 11th January, 2021.
It is to clarify that the interim order of stay/status quo, if any, already passed, to continue till the next date of hearing.
(Roma Ambwani) Registrar-in- Charge
New Delhi, 30th September, 2020
M
FPA-FE-59, 62, 65-66/MUM/2009
Page 2 of 2
M/s. State Bank of Hyderabad
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
M/s. Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur
M/s. Dena Bank
M/s. UCO Bank
G.C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
