The Acting Chairman of the Appellate Tribunal for FEMA, PMLA, etc., granted an adjournment in four appeals to allow the respondents to file rejoinders following the death of a director of one appellant.
Glato appointee adjournment to 17th August 2020 for filing of rejoinders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS, PBPT Act AT NEW DELHI
1. MP-PMLA-3229/LKW/2017 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-592/LKW/2014 Chanda Singh … Appellant/Applicant 2. MP-PMLA-3230/LKW/2017 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-593/LKW/2014 Santoshi Devi … Appellant/Applicant 3. FPA-PMLA-589/LKW/2014 Sonanchal Building Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant 4. FPA-PMLA-590/LKW/2014 Angesh Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Mr. Varun Bhadola, proxy counsel Mr. Anshuman Sinha, Adv. |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : ACTING CHAIRMAN |
| ORDER 17.02.2020 |
FPA-PMLA-592, 593, 589 & 590/LKW/2014
Mr. Varun Bhadola, proxy counsel is present for Mr. Anshuman Sinha, ld. counsel for the appellant and seeks an adjournment on the grounds that one of the Directors of the Sonanchal Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. has expired. As a result of which rejoinder could not be filed.
On the request of the proxy counsel appearing for the appellant, appeal is adjourned to 17th August, 2020 for filing of rejoinders.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 17th February, 2020
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-592, 593, 589 & 590/LKW/2014
Page 1 of 1
Chanda Singh
Santoshi Devi
Sonanchal Building Pvt. Ltd.
Angesh Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd.
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
G.C. Mishra
Shri G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
