The Appellate Tribunal adjourned the filing of written synopsis for a money laundering reference, marking the matter for hearing on 11 October 2017.
An order regarding procedural adjournment for filing of arguments. No substantive decision on the merits of the appeal is given in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3599/LKW/2017 (Adj.) FPA-PMLA-589/LKW/2014
Sonanchal Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Imran Alam, Advocate Shri Abhay Pandey, Advocate For the respondent : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
14.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-589/LKW/2014
An adjournment is sought on behalf of the appellant as the main arguing counsel is not available due to personal difficulty, which is not opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent.
List on 11th October, 2017.
Both the parties are to file the written synopsis on or before the next date of hearing.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 14th July, 2017. ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-589/LKW/2014
Page 1 of 1
Sonanchal Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
