Appeal regarding compliance with a tribunal order in an enforcement matter. The appellant claimed compliance but the execution petition was adjourned due to the respondent's counsel absence.
matter adjourned for hearing
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-463/DLI/2013
Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Kshitij Maheshwari, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate On behalf of Mr. Mohd. Faraz, Advocate |
| CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA |
: ACTING CHAIRMAN |
ORDER 10.02.2020
FPA-PMLA-463/DLI/2013
Shri Kshitij Maheshwari, The learned counsel for the appellant is present. Shri Atul Tripathi, appearing for Mr. Mohd. Faraz, the main counsel for the Respondent is also present. The learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the order of this tribunal has been complied by the Enforcement Directorate as such the execution petition may be disposed of. The said decision could not be taken due to the absence of the main counsel for the Respondent.
List on 20th February, 2020 for hearing on this issue.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 10th February, 2020 ‘D’ FPA-PMLA-463/DLI/2013
Page 1 of 1
Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
G.C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
18 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
