The Appellate Tribunal listed the condonation of delay application for hearing on 15 December 2020 due to the absence of counsel for both parties in a 2019 proceeding. No substantive order was passed on the merits of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-5138/HYD/2018 (COD) MP-PMLA-5139/HYD/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-5140/HYD/2018 (Exem.) FPA-PMLA-2629/HYD/2018
Vijaya Bank … Appellant/Applicant
Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad …
Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : None For the Respondent (ED) : Mr. Neeraj Atri, Advocate On behalf of Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 07.09.2020
MP-PMLA-5138/HYD/2018 (COD) in FPA-PMLA-2629/HYD/2018
None for the appellant. Mr. Neeraj Atri, Advocate appeared on behalf of Mr. Nitesh Rana, learned counsel for the respondent. It is seen from the order dated 04.11.2019 that the condonation of delay application is to be heard in presence of both the parties. The condonation of delay application could not be taken due to absence of main counsels of both the parties.
List the condonation of delay application on 15th December, 2020.
(G. C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 07th September, 2020
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-2629/HYD/2018
Page 1 of 1
Vijaya Bank
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
