Listing of a condonation of delay application for hearing on 17.03.2020; notice that COD application will be heard in the presence of both parties.
The Appellate Tribunal for Safety of Act listed the application for condonation of delay for hearing on 17.03.2020. It was held that the COD application is to be heard in the presence of both parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS, PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-5138/HYD/2018 (COD) MP-PMLA-5139/HYD/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-5140/HYD/2018 (Exem.)
&
FPA-PMLA-2629/HYD/2018
Vijaya Bank … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None For the respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 04.11.2019
FPA-PMLA-2629/HYD/2018
None for the appellant. It is contended by the learned counsel for the respondent that reply has been filed on 28th March, 2019. The same is not on record. The registry is directed to trace the same and place it on record. The learned counsel for the respondent has filed another copy of the reply which is taken on record. Reply to the condonation of delay application has been filed. There is a huge delay in filing the appeal. It is submitted by the respondent that the copy has already been provided to the appellant. The COD application is to be heard in presence of both the parties. List the application for condonation of delay for hearing on 17th March, 2020.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 4th November, 2019
‘D’ FPA-PMLA-2629/HYD/2018
Page 1 of 1
Vijaya Bank
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
