The Tribunal took on record a corrigendum by appellants seeking condonation of 80 days delay in filing appeal under FEMA. It directed filing of reply by respondent within three weeks and listed the application for July 9, 2020.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4792/MUM/2018 (COD) MP-PMLA-4793/MUM/2018 (Exem.) & FPA-PMLA-2465/MUM/2018
M/s. Kapotora Builders & Anr.
… Appellants
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai& Ors. … Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Bhushan Oza, Advocate Mr. Anuj Kumar Chauhan, Advocate For the Respondent no.1 (ED) : Mr. S. K. Sharma, Advocate
CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 13.03.2020
FPA-PMLA-2465/MUM/2018
Learned counsels for both the parties are present. A corrigendum has been filed by the learned counsel for the appellant mentioning therein that there is a delay of 80 days and to condone the said delay in filing the present appeal. The same is taken on record. Copy of the corrigendum has been served on the learned counsel for the respondent, who seeks three weeks time to file an appropriate reply to the application for condonation of delay. Let the same be filed with an advance copy to be served on the other side.
List the application for condonation of delay on 09th July, 2020.
(G. C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 13th March, 2020
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-2465/MUM/2018
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 80 days in filing the appeal should be condoned.
Whether time should be granted to the respondent for filing reply.
M/s. Kapotora Builders & Anr.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
