This order marks the first listing of a delayed appeal against an Enforcement Directorate decision. The tribunal accepted the appellant's request for a reply from the respondent regarding the condonation of delay before final disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4792/MUM/2018 (COD) MP-PMLA-4793/MUM/2018 (Exem.) FPA-PMLA-2465/MUM/2018
M/s Kapotora Builders
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellant | : Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Advocate Mr. Bhushan Oza, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER 24.08.2018
MP-PMLA-4792/MUM/2018 (COD) in FPA-PMLA-2465/MUM/2018
The present appeal has been filed u/s 26 of PMLA against the order dated 15th March, 2018. Alongwith the appeal an application for condonation of 85 days delay in filing the appeal has also been filed.
Mr. S.K. Sharma, Counsel for the respondent opposes the prayer made in the application.
Let the reply be filed within four weeks.
List on 1st November, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 24th August, 2018.
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-2465/MUM/2018
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay in filing appeal under section 26 of PMLA is maintainable.
Whether a reply is required from the respondent on the delay application before the appeal is finally disposed.
M/s Kapotora Builders
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
